GOOD MORNING IRAQ ! CNN confirms use of Napalm by Coalition Forces...
Analysis : More fighting will erupt in and around Kurdistan - involving Iran, Iraq, Kurdistan, Turkey, Syria, the US, Russia and Israel. Those governments all want to control the water in Kurdistan, since water is much
more valuable than the also in abundance present oil.
The Dutch author worked for many decades for international A/V media as foreign correspondent, of which 10 years - also during Gulf War I - in the Arab world and Middle East.)
Every bullet and every bomb breeds more terrorism !
"US to send 120,000 extra troops"
The US is sending an extra 120,000 troops to the Iraq war. In addition to the 30,000 strong 4th Infantry Division, which began leaving Texas for Kuwait yesterday, the 1st Armored Division, 1st Cavalry Division and the 2nd and 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiments have been called up. The ships carrying
the the 4th Division's equipment are not expected to dock in Kuwait until about April 12." (www.thetimes.co.uk )
Chamsin (sandstorm) now also is the Arabic word for "Waterloo".
Some weeks ago Italian press reports claimed that some 100,000 body bags and 6,000 coffins had been secretly delivered to the US Sigonella base in Italy.
Immediately I was reminded of the first thing I saw, arriving at Saigon's 'Tan Son Nhut' airport on April 17th 1971. Platoons of american soldiers were leaving planes, walking past the hundreds of body bags on the tarmac. In May 1966 the American presence in Vietnam was doubled from two hundred thousand to over four hundred thousand troops. The same dreadful mistake
made in the war on Iraq now. This umpteenth 'illegal attack and invasion' by the United States is - as I see it - developing into another "bad war". It is known that the 'Chamsin/sandstorm' damaged and destroyed high-tech material for hundreds of millions ; the billions and billions of fine grains of sand being the biggest enemy. Making all 'Star Trek' equipment worthless,
or at least dangerously unreliable.
If only Fox, CNN etc. had reality shown : body bags on prime time.
Archbishop Renato Martino, president of the Pope's Council of Peace and Justice, said the consignment had arrived at the Sigonella base, near Catania on the island of Sicily. If Fox, CNN etc. had really shown this on
prime time ; would any American who saw the 100.000 body bags being delivered to the Sigonella base, be supporting the Bush government further into a "bad war" ? By doubling the military in Iraq ? The idea is growing that what's destroying America in Afghanistan, Iraq etc. is the fact that most of the intelligent American public was never really persuaded in the case for fighting in the Arab world at all. The veterans too remember the first Persian Gulf War. That war lasted like 40 days, but the CNN propaganda, including commercials for the new war, never stopped.
And now we're all in a quagmire again, thanks to US Foreign Policy's "Alleingang"; the Bush/Wolfowitz-plan.
Like in the present case, were United States Army airborne and other forces which still are being parachuted into Kurdistan, have started occupying the
water rich Kurdistan area, under the pretext of fighting terrorism in Iraq. Ten thousands of troops coming in have started 'preparing' the Kurdistan region. Via an airfield seized in the so called "opening of a northern front against Saddam Hussein".
America is not by consent but by force altering the destiny of the Middle East at the cost of also many own lives. And Kurdistan will stay occupied, with every american bullet and every american bomb breeding more terrorism. For, to secure the future of Israel, the United States will not allow the Kurds to be independent. Definitely not as long as most of the water in the region - and especially the water for Israel - originates in the mountain regions of now occupied Kurdistan. The Kurdish and especially the Peshmerga
warlords ('they who face death') will only serve the US armed forces as long as this is in their own interest. The very second they understand that even in the future the huge oil and water profits will go to a third party, they
will turn their weapons on anything American or British
Analysis : More fighting will erupt in and around Kurdistan - involving Iran, Iraq, Kurdistan, Turkey, Syria, the US, Russia and Israel. Those governments all want to control the water in Kurdistan, since water is much
more valuable than the - also in abundance present - oil.
CNN confirms use of Napalm by Coalition Forces
URL : http://globalresearch.ca/articles/CNN303A.html
CIA REPORT ON KURDISTAN* : THE US 'ON THE WATERFRONT ' !
dc.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=6...
Russia vs USA ?
http://dc.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=59538&group=webcast
"Killing fields Afghanistan" Gun Camera 'instruction' footage
http://dc.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=52680
The CIA-link/URL above didn't function : here's the :
CIA Report : Analysis conc. the Kurdistan water resources : New York Times | Friday 31 January 2003.
Reference : Professor Steven Pelletiere, the Central Intelligence Agency's senior political analyst on Iraq during the Iran-Iraq war, also was a professor at the Army War College from 1988 to 2000. As such he was privy to much of the classified material that flowed through Washington, having to do with the Persian Gulf. In addition, Prof. Pelletiere headed a 1991 Army investigation into how the Iraqis would fight a war against the United States.
Links : CIA's report 'On the Waterfront' URL
http://truthout.org/docs_02/020303C.htm
Or Prof. Pelletiere on very informative 16 min. video :
http://dc.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=53870
Israel : "The New Water Politics of the Middle East" :
http://www.israeleconomy.org/strategic/water.htm
Kurdistan Web site Map/picturesiext :
http://members.tripod.com/surkew/index.htm
COPYRIGHT NOTICE - In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed by the Foreign Press Foundation under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information".
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml


Yorumlar
Protests continue despite Iraqi jubilation
It seems that many of us were wrong about Iraq by underestimating the level of repression and the extent of horrible acts of violence committed against the Iraqi people over the last 20 years.
The strong resistance to the war in the Arab world, Europe and in the U.S. now appears to be less about the Iraqis and much more about political self-interest and thoughtless antaganism towards the west. We should now reconsider and express gratitude for U.S. sacrifices and its willingness to do what was right.
gratitude for what?
Bob Roberts, you seem to be misunderstanding, if not misusing, this web site. In the US, there are lots of media channels like Fox, Sky, CNN etc. where anybody can find news supporting the 'Middleeast liberation mania' of the US government by the ton. The same is true for Britain and other countries. These media corporations have huge resources and they have many 'embedded' reporters reporting from the same trenches with US-UK soldiers. And these media corporations point their cameras to 'people celebrating their liberators', wherever they find them, but ignore thousands of killed and maimed children, women and men, all by 'intelligent missiles'. These media corporations showed the same attitude in Basra and other cities in Iraq, early in the attack, when they found small groups of people welcoming the US-UK soldiers, but had to back down when Al Jazeraa and other media channels pictured the bloody horror of 'US liberation' and showed Iraqis fighting against their so called liberators.
But indymedia sites, together with other alternative and independent news sites in the world, tries to provide news from different viewpoints. So when you watch Fox or Sky 'specially produced news' and come write here that ALL the people of Bagdad are cheering and flowering US soldiers, this has no use. A waste of everybodys' time, yours included.
Also, please do not waste your time requesting 'gratitude for U.S. sacrifices' in indymedia pages, your naivety is strikingly insincere. If the US government decides to atone for its crimes against humanity, say since 1898; and shuts down Nazi style concentration camps such as Guantanamo and terror schools exporting criminals such as the School of Americas; and decides again to honor international agreements on ecology, human rights and mass extermination weapons; and starts to honor the founding principles of the UN, such as non-agression; even all of these need not deserve gratitude, this is what every government has to do.
R.Fisk: A day that began with shellfire ended with a oppresse...
R.Fisk: A day that began with shellfire ended with a oppressed people walking like giants
Robert Fisk: A day that began with shellfire ended with a once-oppressed people walking like giants
10 April 2003
The Americans "liberated" Baghdad yesterday, destroyed the centre of Saddam Hussein's quarter-century of brutal dictatorial power but brought behind them an army of looters who unleashed upon the ancient city a reign of pillage and anarchy. It was a day that began with shellfire and air strikes and blood-bloated hospitals and ended with the ritual destruction of the dictator's statues. The mobs shrieked their delight. Men who, for 25 years, had grovellingly obeyed Saddam's most humble secret policeman turned into giants, bellowing their hatred of the Iraqi leader as his vast and monstrous statues thundered to the ground.
"It is the beginning of our new freedom," an Iraqi shopkeeper shouted at me. Then he paused, and asked: "What do the Americans want from us now?' The great Lebanese poet Kalil Gibran once wrote that he pitied the nation that welcomed its tyrants with trumpetings and dismissed them with hootings of derision. And the people of Baghdad performed this same deadly ritual yesterday, forgetting that they – or their parents – had behaved in identical fashion when the Arab Socialist Baath Party destroyed the previous dictatorship of Iraq's generals and princes. Forgetting, too, that the "liberators" were a new and alien and all-powerful occupying force with neither culture nor language nor race nor religion to unite them with Iraq.
As tens of thousands of Shia Muslim poor from the vast slums of Saddam City poured into the centre of Baghdad to smash their way into shops, offices and government ministries – an epic version of the same orgy of theft and mass destruction that the British did so little to prevent in Basra – US Marines watched from only a few hundred yards away as looters made off with cars, rugs, hoards of money, computers, desks, sofas, even door-frames.
In Al-Fardus (Paradise) Square, US Marines helped a crowd of youths pull down the gaunt and massive statue of Saddam by roping it to an armoured personnel carrier. It toppled menacingly forward from its plinth to hang lengthways above the ground, right arm still raised in fraternal greetings to the Iraqi people.
It was a symbolic moment in more ways than one. I stood behind the first man to seize a hatchet and smash at the imposing grey marble plinth. But within seconds, the marble had fallen away to reveal a foundation of cheap bricks and badly cracked cement. That's what the Americans always guessed Saddam's regime was made of, although they did their best – in the late Seventies and early Eighties – to arm him and service his economy and offer him political support, to turn him into the very dictator he became.
In one sense, therefore, America – occupying the capital of an Arab nation for the first time in its history – was helping to destroy what it had spent so much time and money creating. Saddam was "our" man and yesterday, metaphorically at least, we annihilated him. Hence the importance of all those statue- bashing mobs, of all that looting and theft.
But of the real and somewhat less imposing Saddam, there was no trace.
Neither he nor his sons, Uday and Qusay, could be found. Had they fled north to their homeland fortress of Tikrit? Or has he – the most popular rumour this – taken refuge in the Russian embassy in Baghdad. Were they hiding out in the cobweb of underground tunnels and bunkers beneath the presidential palaces? True, their rule was effectively over. The torture chambers and the prisons should now be turned into memorials, the true story of Iraq's use of gas warfare revealed at last. But history suggests otherwise. Prisons usually pass over to new management, torture cells too, and who would want the world to know how easy it is to make weapons of mass destruction.
There will be mass graves that will have to be opened – though in the Middle East, these disinterments are usually performed in order to allow more blood to be poured onto the graves.
Not that the nightmare is entirely over. For though the Americans will mark yesterday as their first day of occupation – they, of course, will call it liberation – vast areas of Baghdad remained outside the control of the United States last night. And at dusk, just before darkness curled over the land, I crossed through the American lines, back to the little bit of Saddam's regime that remained intact within the vast, flat city of Baghdad. Down grey, carless streets, I drove to the great bridges over the Tigris which the Americans had still not crossed from the west. And there, on the corner of Bab al-Moazzam Street, were a small group of mujahedin fighters, firing Kalashnikov rifles at the American tanks on the other side of the waterway. It was brave and utterly pathetic and painfully instructive.
For the men turned out to be Arabs from Algeria, Morocco, Syria, Jordan, Palestine. Not an Iraqi was among them. The Baathist militiamen, the Republican Guard, the greasy Iraqi intelligence men, the so-called Saddam Fedayeen had all left their posts and crept home. Only the foreign Arabs, like the Frenchmen of the Nazi Charlemagne Division in 1945 Berlin, fought on. At the end, many Iraqis had shunned these men and a group of them had turned up to sit outside the lobby of the Palestine Hotel, pleading to journalists for help in returning home.
"We left our wives and children and came here to die for these people and then they told us to go," one of them said. But at the end of the Bab al-Moazzam Bridge they fought on last night and when I left them I could hear the American jets flying in from the west. Hurtling back through those empty streets, I could hear, too, the American tank fire as it smashed into their building.
But tanks come in two forms: the dangerous, deadly kind and the "liberating" kind from which smart young soldiers with tanned faces look down with smiles at Iraqis who are obliging enough to wave at them, tanks with cute names stencilled on their gun barrels, names like "Kitten Rescue" and "Nightmare Witness" (this with a human skull painted underneath) and "Pearl". And there has to be a first soldier – of the occupying or liberating kind – who stands at the very front of the first column of every vast and powerful army.
So I walked up to Corporal David Breeze of the 3rd Battalion, 4th Marine Regiment, from Michigan. He hadn't spoken to his parents for two months so I called his mother on my satellite phone and from the other side of the world, Mrs Breeze came on the line and I handed the phone to her son.
And so this is what the very first soldier to enter the centre of Baghdad told his family yesterday evening. "Hi you guys. I'm in Baghdad.
"I'm ringing to say 'Hi! I love you. I'm doing fine. I love you guys. The war will be over in a few days. I'll see you all soon.''
Yes, they all say the war will be over soon. There will be a homecoming no doubt for Corporal Breeze and I suppose I admired his innocence despite the deadly realities that await America in this dangerous, cruel land. For even as the marine tanks thrashed and ground down the highway, there were men and women who saw them and stood, the women scarved, the men observing the soldiers with the most acute attention, who spoke of their fear for the future, who talked of how Iraq could never be ruled by foreigners.
"You'll see the celebrations and we will be happy Saddam has gone," one of them said to me. "But we will then want to rid ourselves of the Americans and we will want to keep our oil and there will be resistance and then they will call us "terrorists". Nor did the Americans look happy "liberators". They pointed their rifles at the pavements and screamed at motorists to stop – one who did not, an old man in an old car, was shot in the head in front of two French journalists.
Of course, the Americans knew they would get a good press by "liberating" the foreign journalists at the Palestine Hotel. They lay in the long grass of the nearest square and pretended to aim their rifles at the rooftops as cameras hissed at them, and they flew a huge American flag from one of their tanks and grinned at the journalists, not one of whom reminded them that just 24 hours earlier, their army had killed two Western journalists with tank fire in that same hotel and then lied about it.
But it was the looters who marked the day as something sinister rather than joyful. In Saddam City, they had welcomed the Americans with "V" signs and cries of "Up America" and the usual trumpetings, but then they had set off downtown for a more important appointment. At the Ministry of Economy, they stole the entire records of Iraq's exports and imports on computer discs, with desk-top computers, with armchairs and fridges and paintings. When I tried to enter the building, the looters swore at me. A French reporter had his money and camera seized by the mob.
At the Olympic sports offices, run by Uday Hussein, they did the same, one old man staggering from the building with a massive portrait of Saddam which he proceeded to attack with his fists, another tottering out of the building bearing a vast ornamental Chinese pot.
True, these were regime targets. But many of the crowds went for shops, smashing their way into furniture stores and professional offices. They came with trucks and pick-ups and trailers pulled by scruffy, underfed donkeys to carry their loot away. I saw a boy making off with an X-ray machine, a woman with a dentist's chair.
At the Ministry of Oil, the minister's black Mercedes limousine was discovered by the looters. Unable to find the keys, they tore the car apart, ripping off its doors, tyres and seats, leaving just the carcass and chassis in front of the huge front entrance.
At the Palestine Hotel, they smashed Saddam's portrait on the lobby floor and set light to the hoarding of the same wretched man over the front door. They cried "Allahuakbar" meaning God is Greater. And there was a message there, too, for the watching Marines if they had understood it.
And so last night, as the explosion of tank shells still crashed over the city, Baghdad lay at the feet of a new master. They have come and gone in the city's history, Abbasids and Ummayads and Mongols and Turks and British and now the Americans. The United States embassy reopened yesterday and soon, no doubt, when the Iraqis have learned to whom they must now be obedient friends, President Bush will come here and there will be new "friends" of America to open a new relationship with the world, new economic fortunes for those who "liberated" them, and – equally no doubt – relations with Israel and a real Israeli embassy in Baghdad.
But winning a war is one thing. Succeeding in the ideological and economic project that lies behind this whole war is quite another. The "real" story for America's mastery over the Arab world starts now.